Omen 32.N.4
Nicole Lundeen, 2021, "Šumma ālu, Omen 32.N.4", Nicla De Zorzi et al., Bestiarium Mesopotamicum, 2018-2021; accessed 10/08/2026 12:08 a.m. at tieromina.acdh-dev.oeaw.ac.at/omens/Omen-32-N-4/tei
↓ 32.N.4 
Sm 0710+   5'  […KU]N.MEŠ-šáinaÉNAit-ta-an-marA.K[AL?DU]?
Sm 0710+If a City2, p. 190, Ex(7), *32.4'5'  […K]UN.MEŠ-ša₂inaE₂NAit-ta-an-mar a-x-[…]
K 06912+   9  10  [š]um-maṣu-ri-ri-it-tu₄šáMIN[KU⸣N.M[EŠ⸣-⸢šá⸣inaÉNAit-⸢tan⸣-[ma⸣rA.⸢KAL⸣?[DU]?
K 06912+If a City2, p. 190, Ex(3), *32.4'9  10  šum-maṣu-ri-ri-it-tu₄ša₂₂KUN.MEŠ-[…]inaE₂NAit-tan-mar a-x-[…]
Copy Text
  • [š]um-maṣu-ri-ri-it-tu₄šáMIN[KU]N.MEŠ-šáinaÉNAit-ta-an-marA.KAL?[DU]?
  • If a City2, p. 166, *32.4'
    šum-maṣu-ri-ri-it-tu₄ša₂₂KUN.MEŠ-ša₂inaE₂NAit-ta-an-mar a x[…]
  • [š]ummaṣurīrittuša₂[zibb]ātušainabītamēliittanmarmīlu?[illak]?
  • [I]f in a man’s house a lizard with two [ta]ils is repeatedly seen — a flood? [will come]?.
  • If a City2, p. 167, *32.4'
    If a lizard that has two tails is repeatedly seen in a man’s house, […]
PHILOLOGICAL COMMENTARY
  • See the commentary at 32.N.3 on the syllabic spelling of šum-ma.
  • The apodosis is broken on both manuscripts. The remnants of the signs following A on both manuscripts are compatible with the reading KAL to form A.KAL ‘a flood’. While there is not another instance among the lizard omens, the phrase ‘a flood will come’ is a common among omen apodoses. See CAD M/2, 70 s.v. mīlu A 1.

The reconstruction of A.KAL DU means the reconstructed transliteration and translation do not match those in If a City 2. That edition (166-67, *32.4’ as well as 190, *32.4’, Ex(3) and Ex(7)) reads instead a-x-[…]. Most of the breaks are also not indicated in the earlier edition, but the omen is otherwise read as above.