Omen 32.N.22
Nicole Lundeen, 2021, "Šumma ālu, Omen 32.N.22", Nicla De Zorzi et al., Bestiarium Mesopotamicum, 2018-2021; accessed 10/08/2026 12:08 a.m. at tieromina.acdh-dev.oeaw.ac.at/omens/Omen-32-N-22/tei
↓ 32.N.22 
Sm 0710+   10'  […ŠUB-u]tŠUB-atENINIM-šú
Sm 0710+If a City2, p. 191, *32.21', Ex(7)[…]-utŠUB-atENKA-šu₂
K 09057.2i   7'  *6'  […ŠUB-a]t?EN!INIM-šú
K 09057.2If a City2, p. 191, *32.21', Ex(4)2[…]xENKA-šu₂
K 03730+   21  DIŠEME.ŠIDanaIGINAŠUB-ut(erasure with traces)ŠUB-tìENINIM-šú(erasure on edge)?
K 03730+If a City2, p. 191, *32.21', Ex(1)DIŠEME.ŠIDanaIGINAŠUB-utŠUB-ti₅ENKA-šu₂
Var. (K 03730+)
  • DIŠEME.ŠIDanaIGINAŠUB-utŠUB-tìENINIM-šú
  • If a City2, p. 168, *32.21'
    DIŠEME.ŠIDanaIGINAŠUB-utŠUB-ti₅ENKA-šu₂
  • šummaṣurārūanapānamēliimqutmiqittibēlamātišu
  • If a lizard falls in front of a man- the downfall of his legal adversary (will occur).
Var. (K 09057.2 and Sm 0710)
  • [DIŠEME.ŠIDanaIGINAŠUB-u]tŠUB-atENINIM-šú
  • [šummaṣurārūanapānamēliimqu]tmaqātbēlamātišu
  • [If a lizard fal]ls [in front of a man]- the downfall of his legal adversary (will occur).
Var. (K 09057.2 and Sm 0710+)
  • If a City2, p. 168, *32.21'
    DIŠEME.ŠIDanaIGINAŠUB-utŠUB-ti₅ENKA-šu₂
      PHILOLOGICAL COMMENTARY
      • See also the separate edition of Sm 0710+ as the omen on line 10’ is part of a triad of omens on that manuscript. 
      • Collation of K 03730+ 21 reveals traces of around four or five erased signs after ŠUB-ut. Also after the line’s final sign -šú, there is an errant head of a wedge. Perhaps it is another erasure as the apodosis is otherwise complete. Collation also confirms the reading ŠUB-tì instead of ŠUB-ti5, as read by If a City 2 (191, *32.21’ ,Ex(1)).
      • In K 12180+ i 7’, the first sign has been tentatively read as -a]t?. If a City 2 (191, *32.21’, Ex(4)2 6’) leaves the sign as an uninterpreted x. There is one visible vertical wedge making the reading ­-tì from K 03730+ 21 impossible. Manuscript Sm 0710+ 10’ has ŠUB-at, which seems plausible here.
      • For a discussion on the repetition of this particular protasis with varying apodoses—though all the apodoses relate to overcoming adversaries—see the discussions at 32.A.5. 
      • After the above omen, there is a gap in the omen sequence. The subsequent omen starts with the ‘standard’ manuscript for the Nineveh recension, K 02708+.