Omen 32.N.10
Nicole Lundeen, 2021, "Šumma ālu, Omen 32.N.10", Nicla De Zorzi et al., Bestiarium Mesopotamicum, 2018-2021; accessed 11/20/2024 6:25 p.m. at tieromina.acdh-dev.oeaw.ac.at/omens/Omen-32-N-10/tei
| ↓ 32.N.10 Score | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copy Text |
|
|
|
PHILOLOGICAL COMMENTARY
- The line K 03730+ 9 is read by If a City 2 (190, *32.9’, Ex(1)) as
DIŠ EME.ŠID ša2 KUN.MEŠ-ša2 […] x uṣ-ṣab
Collation of the manuscript shows traces of a broken sign on the right-hand edge of the break. Its traces, the tail end of two horizontal wedges, fit with the reading NÍG.TU]K. There is also a broken ana before the break.
- After collation of manuscript K 06912+, it is apparent that part of the sign ŠID is visible at the beginning of line 19, and there is a broken sign at the end of line 20, after NÍG.TUK. Both signs are missing in If a City 2’s (190, *32.9’, Ex(3)) reading of these lines.
The remnants of the sign after NÍG.TUK are compatible with the reading u[ṣ-sab]—there is what appears to be a broken KUR on the manuscript—but incompatible with a reading of šú, as suggested by If a City 2 (166, *32.9’).
